A new approach: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with priority access to small bowel mesentery

作者全名："Pi, Feng; Peng, Xudong; Xie, Chaozheng; Tang, Gang; Qiu, Yuhao; Chen, Zhenzhou; Wei, Zhengqiang"

作者地址："[Pi, Feng; Peng, Xudong; Xie, Chaozheng; Tang, Gang; Qiu, Yuhao; Chen, Zhenzhou; Wei, Zhengqiang] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China"

通信作者："Wei, ZQ (通讯作者)，Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China."

来源：FRONTIERS IN SURGERY

ESI学科分类：　

WOS号：WOS:000931178500001

JCR分区：Q2

影响因子：1.6

年份：2023

卷号：9

期号：　

开始页：　

结束页：　

文献类型：Article

关键词：laparoscopy; colon tumor; right hemicolectomy; surgery; priority access to the small bowel mesentery

摘要："BackgroundFor laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, the intermediate approach is commonly employed. However, this approach possesses several disadvantages. In this study, we compare priority access to the small bowel mesentery and the intermediate approach. MethodsThe clinical data of 196 patients admitted to the First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy from January 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected and divided into the small bowel mesenteric priority access and traditional intermediate access groups. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, number of lymph node dissection, postoperative anal venting time, toleration of solid and liquid intake, and postoperative hospital stay and complications were compared between the two different approaches. ResultsIn total, 81 cases of small bowel mesenteric priority access and 115 cases of intermediate approach for right hemi-colonic radical resection were compared. The operative time was 191.98 +/- 46.05 and 209.48 +/- 46.08 min in the small bowel mesenteric priority access and intermediate access groups, respectively; the difference was statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding and lymph node clearance. However, the scatter plot analysis showed that severe intraoperative bleeding was relatively less frequent in the small mesenteric priority access group, compared with that in the intermediate approach group. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the first exhaust and defecation times, hospital stay after operation, toleration of solid and liquid intake, and postoperative complication between the two groups. ConclusionIn laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, the small bowel mesenteric priority approach can significantly shorten the operation time compared with the intermediate approach. It can reduce intraoperative bleeding and the operation is simple and safe to perform, making it suitable for less experienced surgeons. Therefore, the small bowel mesenteric priority approach has the potential to be a suitable alternative and deserves further clinical promotion and application."

基金机构：Chongqing Joint Medical Scientific Research Project of Science and Health [2018ZDXM007]; Chongqing Key Diseases Research and Application Demonstration Program [2019ZX003]

基金资助正文：Funding This study was funded by Chongqing Joint Medical Scientific Research Project of Science and Health (2018ZDXM007) and Chongqing Key Diseases Research and Application Demonstration Program (No. 2019ZX003).