Inhalational Versus Propofol-based Intravenous Maintenance of Anesthesia for Emergence Delirium in Adults: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

作者全名："Yang, Yong; Feng, Lin; Ji, Chengcheng; Lu, Kaizhi; Chen, Yang; Chen, Bing"

作者地址："[Yang, Yong; Lu, Kaizhi; Chen, Yang] Army Med Univ, Mil Med Univ 3, Southwest Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Chongqing, Peoples R China; [Feng, Lin; Ji, Chengcheng] Chongqing Jiangbei Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Anesthesia, Chongqing, Peoples R China; [Chen, Bing] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing, Peoples R China"

通信作者："Chen, B (通讯作者)，Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing, Peoples R China."

来源：JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY

ESI学科分类：CLINICAL MEDICINE

WOS号：WOS:000944009900005

JCR分区：Q2

影响因子：2.3

年份：2023

卷号：35

期号：2

开始页：177

结束页：186

文献类型：Review

关键词：emergence delirium; anesthesia; intravenous; inhalation; adult; meta-analysis; perioperative neuroscience

摘要："Emergence delirium (ED) is a severe postoperative complication that increases the risk for injury, self-extubation, and hemorrhage. Inhalational maintenance of anesthesia is a risk factor for ED in pediatric patients, but its impact in adults is undefined. This meta-analysis compares the incidence of ED between inhalational and propofol-based intravenous maintenance of anesthesia. Following a search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, 12 high-quality randomized controlled trials including 1440 patients, were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Compared with propofol-based intravenous maintenance of anesthesia, inhalational maintenance increased the incidence of ED in adults (risk ratio [RR], 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-3.14; P=0.002). This was confirmed by sensitivity analysis, trial sequential analysis, and subgroup analyses of studies that assessed ED via Aono's four-point scale (RR, 3.72; 95% CI: 1.48-9.31; P=0.005) and the Ricker Sedation Agitation Scale (RR, 3.48; 95% CI: 1.66-7.32; P=0.001), studies that included sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia (RR, 1.87; 95% CI: 1.13-3.09; P=0.02), studies that reported ED as the primary outcome (RR, 2.73; 95% CI: 1.53-4.86; P=0.0007), and studies that investigated ocular (RR, 2.98; 95% CI: 1.10-8.10; P=0.03), nasal (RR; 95% CI: 1.27-6.50; P=0.01), and abdominal (RR, 3.25; 95% CI: 1.12-9.40; P=0.03) surgeries, but not intracranial surgery (RR, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.34-1.54; P=0.40). In summary, inhalational maintenance of sevoflurane was a risk factor for ED compared with propofol-based intravenous maintenance in adults who underwent ocular, nasal, and abdominal surgeries but not intracranial surgery."

基金机构：　

基金资助正文：