Progestogens in women with threatened miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage: A meta-analysis
作者全名:"Zhao, Yunli; D'Souza, Rohan; Gao, Ya; Hao, Qiukui; Kallas-Silva, Lucas; Steen, Jeremy P.; Guyatt, Gordon"
作者地址:"[Zhao, Yunli] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Geriatr Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Yunli] Chongqing Med Univ, Chongqing Municipal Clin Res Ctr Geriatr, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Yunli] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Ctr Gerontol & Geriatr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr, Chengdu, Peoples R China; [D'Souza, Rohan; Gao, Ya; Hao, Qiukui; Guyatt, Gordon] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada; [D'Souza, Rohan] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada; [Gao, Ya] Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China; [Hao, Qiukui] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada; [Kallas-Silva, Lucas] Fac Israelita Ciencias Saude Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; [Steen, Jeremy P.] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada; [Zhao, Yunli] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Geriatr Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing 400010, Peoples R China"
通信作者:"Zhao, YL (通讯作者),Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Geriatr Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing 400010, Peoples R China."
来源:ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
ESI学科分类:CLINICAL MEDICINE
WOS号:WOS:001184471700001
JCR分区:Q1
影响因子:3.5
年份:2024
卷号:
期号:
开始页:
结束页:
文献类型:Review; Early Access
关键词:live birth; meta-analysis; progestogens; recurrent miscarriage; threatened miscarriage
摘要:"IntroductionClinical practice guidelines provide inconsistent recommendations regarding progestogen supplementation for threatened and recurrent miscarriage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of progestogens for these patients.Material and methodsWe searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials up to October 6, 2023 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing progestogen supplementation to placebo or no treatment for pregnant women with threatened or recurrent miscarriage. We assessed the risk of bias using a modified version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.ResultsOf 15 RCTs (6616 pregnancies) reporting on threatened or recurrent miscarriage, 12 (5610 pregnancies) reported on threatened miscarriage with or without a prior history of miscarriage. Results indicated that progesterone probably increases live births (relative risk (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.10, absolute increase 3.1%, moderate certainty). Of these RCTs, three (1973 pregnancies) reporting on threatened miscarriage with a prior history of miscarriage indicated that progesterone possibly increases live births (RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, absolute increase 4.4%; low certainty), while four (2540 pregnancies) reporting on threatened miscarriage and no prior miscarriage left the effect very uncertain (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.10, absolute increase 1.7%; very low certainty). Three trials reporting on 1006 patients with a history of two or more prior miscarriages indicated progesterone probably increases live births (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.98-1.19, absolute increase 5.7%, moderate certainty). Six RCTs that reported on 2979 patients with at least one prior miscarriage indicated that progesterone probably increases live births (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13, absolute increase 5.0%; moderate certainty). Progesterone probably has little or no effect on congenital anomalies (RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.76-1.48, absolute increase 0.1%; moderate certainty), and other serious adverse pregnancy events (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.83-1.40, absolute increase 0.2%, moderate certainty).ConclusionsIn women at increased risk of pregnancy loss, progestogens probably increase live births without increasing adverse maternal and neonatal events. It remains possible that the benefit is restricted to those with prior miscarriages. Previous meta-analyses have generated inconsistent summary estimates for progestogen supplementation effects on live birth for women with threatened or recurrent miscarriage. To assess this, we conducted a meta-analysis and found an increase in the likelihood of a live birth with progestogen supplementation, most convincing in those with prior miscarriageimage"
基金机构:China Scholarship Council
基金资助正文:We thank Rachel Couban (librarian at McMaster University; email: rcouban@mcmaster.ca) for assisting with developing the search strategy and Kristen Eckler for interpreting the data. Yunli Zhao and Ya Gao acknowledge funding from the China Scholarship Council.