Patient and public involvement in systematic reviews: frequency, determinants, stages, barriers, and dissemination

作者全名：Zhou, Qi; He, Hongfeng; Li, Qinyuan; Zhao, Junxian; Wang, Ling; Luo, Zhengxiu; Wang, Xiaohui; Chen, Yaolong

作者地址：[Zhou, Qi; Chen, Yaolong] Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, 199 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China; [Zhou, Qi] Lanzhou Univ, Affiliate Cochrane China Network, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China; [He, Hongfeng; Zhao, Junxian; Wang, Ling; Wang, Xiaohui] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 199 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China; [Li, Qinyuan; Luo, Zhengxiu] Chongqing Med Univ, Childrens Hosp, Key Lab Child Dev & Disorders, Natl Clin Res Ctr Child Hlth & Disorders,Minist Ed, Chongqing, Peoples R China; [Wang, Xiaohui; Chen, Yaolong] Chinese Patient & Publ Guidelines Alliance, Lanzhou, Peoples R China; [Chen, Yaolong] Lanzhou Univ, Chinese Acad Med Sci, Sch Basic Med Sci, Res Unit Evidence Based Evaluat & Guidelines,2021R, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China; [Chen, Yaolong] Chongqing Med Univ, Childrens Hosp, Chevidence Lab Child & Adolescent Hlth, Chongqing, Peoples R China

通信作者：Chen, YL (通讯作者)，Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, 199 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China.; Wang, XH (通讯作者)，Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 199 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China.

来源：JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

ESI学科分类：SOCIAL SCIENCES, GENERAL

WOS号：WOS:001237246500001

JCR分区：Q1

影响因子：7.3

年份：2024

卷号：170

期号：　

开始页：　

结束页：　

文献类型：Article

关键词：Patient and public involvement; Systematic review; Frequency; Determinant; Barrier; Dissemination

摘要：Objectives: To investigate the frequency, determinants, stages, and barriers of patient and public involvement (PPI) in systematic reviews and to explore its association with the dissemination of reviews. Study Design and Setting: We examined systematic reviews that required the inclusion of a PPI declaration, published in The BMJ between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the association between PPI and key variables. We investigated the association between PPI and the dissemination of reviews using Altmetric scores, citations, and full-text views. Results: A total of 217 systematic reviews were included, of which 56 (25.8%, 95% CI 20.0%-31.6%) included PPI, with a steady increase from 5.9% (1/17) in 2015 to 44.4% (4/35) in 2022. Of the 217 systematic reviews, 160 (73.7%) involved methodologists as co-authors. Factors significantly associated with a higher proportion of PPI included the publication year after 2019 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.46, 95% CI 1.26-4.83), the involvement of methodologist (aOR 3.08; 95% CI 1.27-7.47), and being led by researchers from high-income countries (aOR 5.47; 95% CI 1.23-24.30). Reviews that included PPI had higher Altmetric scores per month (6.6 vs 3.4, P = .002) and more monthly full-text (1048.6 vs 636.5, P < .001) and PDF (217.7 vs 129.0, P < .001) views than reviews without PPI. However, there was no difference in the monthly citations (2.2 vs 2.0, P = .365) between reviews with and without PPI. Conclusion: The proportion of systematic reviews reporting PPI in The BMJ has increased over time, possibly due to journal policies, but it still remains at a low level. Reviews led by researchers from high-income countries or involving methodologists are associated with a higher frequency of PPI within The BMJ. Furthermore, reviews incorporating PPI within The BMJ have a higher potential for broad dissemination. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金机构：Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2021-ey13]

基金资助正文：Funding: This project was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. lzujbky-2021-ey13) . 1